Aspirin is associated with lower risks of severe covid-19 disease: a population-based study

IntroductionThe use of aspirin has been hypothesized to improve severe clinical outcomes in COVID-19 infection. The present study aims to evaluate the effect of both antecedent and inpatient aspirin use, individually and concomitant with other medications, on severe disease outcomes in COVID-19 positive patients treated with steroids/antiviral therapy.MethodsConsecutive patients who attended Hong Kong's public hospitals or outpatient clinics between 1st January and 8th December 2020 for COVID-19 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and received steroids/antiviral therapy were included. Propensity score matching (1:1) between aspirin users and non-users was performed. The primary endpoint was the composite outcome of the need for intubation and 30-day all-cause mortality.ResultsA total of 2664 RT-PCR positive and hospitalized COVID-19 patients receiving steroids/antiviral therapy were included (male= 50.7%, baseline age= 52.3 [35.2-64.6] years old). Over follow-up, 2.96% suffered from 30-day all-cause mortality. Univariable logistic regression showed that aspirin use was associated with lower odds of severe COVID-19 in the propensity score-matched cohort (odds ratio [OR]: 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.18, 0.6];P=0.0003). This association remained significant following adjustment for significant confounders (OR= 0.33, 95% CI= [0.18, 0.59], P= 0002).ConclusionAspirin use was associated with lower odds of severe outcomes in COVID-19.Conflict of InterestNone

COVID-19 CHALLENGE IN THE ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME – AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF A SERBIAN COHORT

BackgroundFacing the outburst of the COVID-19 pandemic, we gradually comprehend its pathophysiology as a coagulopathy characterized by increased risks of arterial, venous, and microvascular thrombosis. Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune, thrombo-inflammatory disease characterized by thrombosis and/or pregnancy loss in the presence of one or more antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL).ObjectivesTo evaluate the clinical scenario of COVID-19 in the APS population of patients.MethodsThis is a single-center, observational, cross-sectional study. Data regarding the severity of COVID-19 (severe COVID-19 considered if interstitial pneumonia was diagnosed), COVID-19 vaccinal status, and post-vaccinal reactions (divided into mild, consisting of fever, myalgia, nausea, and severe if thrombosis at any point occurred) were collected from 44 APS patients (21 with primary and 23 with APS associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 90.1% female). aPL analysis included the detection of aCL (IgG/IgM), ß2GPI (IgG/IgM), and LA Results were compared to the control group consisting of 31 healthy individuals, with no APS, matched to the APS group regarding age and gender.ResultsAt the moment of COVID-19 infection, 75% of the APS group was taking Aspirin, 15.9% warfarin, 2.3% non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant, 59.1% chloroquine, 31.8% corticosteroid, 2.3% methotrexate. None of the above-mentioned medications were taken from a control group. There was no difference regarding the severity of COVID-19 between APS patients and healthy controls: 84.1% of APS had mild and 15.9% severe COVID-19 (p=0.509, p=0.292 respectively). But the difference regarding the need for hospitalization was significant (none of the healthy controls compared to 11.4% APS patients, p=0.0073). Interestingly, COVID-19 occurred in 72.7% of APS patients before the COVID-19 vaccination compared to 35.5% of healthy controls, p=0.001, conversely, a significantly lower percentage of vaccinated APS patients had COVID-19 compared to healthy controls (34.1% to 71.0%, p=0.002). 27% of APS patients had mild post-vaccinal reactions, none with severe.ConclusionDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, APS patients in Serbia were at higher risk for hospitalization. However, there was no difference in the severity of clinical presentation compared to non -the APS population. We can only speculate that APS therapy consisting of Aspirin, Chloroquine, and oral anticoagulant therapy contributed to this finding. Moreover, COVID-19 vaccination in the APS population, followed by a low incidence of mild post-vaccinal reactions, had more benefits in protection than in non-APS individuals.REFERENCES:NIL.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination induced cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: Do megakaryocytes, platelets and lipid mediators make up the orchestra?

The COVID-19 vaccines comprised of adenoviral vectors encoding the Spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 are highly effective but associated with rare thrombotic complications. The adenovirus vector infects epithelial cells expressing the coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor (CAR). The S glycoprotein expressed locally stimulates neutralizing antibody and cellular immune responses. These vaccines have been associated with thromboembolic events including cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). S glycoprotein stimulates the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and leads to massive generation of thromboxane A2 in COVID-19. Megakaryocytes express CAR and we postulate that S glycoprotein stimulated generation of thromboxane A2 leads to megakaryocyte activation, biogenesis of activated platelets and thereby increased thrombogenicity. Cerebral vein sinuses express podoplanin, a natural ligand for CLEC2 receptors on platelets. Platelets traversing through the cerebral vein sinuses could be further activated by thromboxane A2-dependent podoplanin-CLEC2 signaling, leading to CVST. A prothrombotic hormonal milieu, and increased generation of thromboxane A2 and platelet activation in healthy females compared to males is consistent with increased risk for CVST observed in women. We propose that antiplatelet agents targeting thromboxane A2 receptor signaling such as low-dose aspirin merit consideration for chemoprophylaxis when administering the adenovirus based COVID-19 vaccines to young adults at risk of thrombosis provided there are no contraindications.

Preeclampsia up to date-What's going on?

Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disorder in pregnancy characterized by placental malperfusion and subsequent multi-organ injury. It accounts for approximately 14% of maternal deaths and 10-25% of perinatal deaths globally. In addition, preeclampsia has been attracting attentions for its association with risks for developing chronic diseases in later life for both mother and child. This mini-review discusses on latest knowledge on prediction, prevention, management, and long-term outcomes of preeclampsia and also touches on association between COVID-19 and preeclampsia. HTN hypertension, HDP hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, PE preeclampsia, BP blood pressure, cfDNA cell-free DNA, ST2 human suppression of tumorigenesis 2, sFlt-1 soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1, PIGF placental growth factor, VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor, VEGFR VEGF receptor, TGFß transforming growth factor ß, ENG endoglin, sENG soluble ENG, PRES posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, AKI acute kidney injury, CVD cardiovascular disease, ESKD end-stage kidney disease, ACE angiotensinogen converting enzyme, Ang angiotensin.

Synchronous spectrofluorimetric determination of favipiravir and aspirin at the nano-gram scale in spiked human plasma; greenness evaluation.

Favipiravir and aspirin are co-administered during COVID-19 treatment to prevent venous thromboembolism. For the first time, a spectrofluorometric method has been developed for the simultaneous analysis of favipiravir and aspirin in plasma matrix at nano-gram detection limits. The native fluorescence spectra of favipiravir and aspirin in ethanol showed overlapping emission spectra at 423 nm and 403 nm, respectively, after excitation at 368 nm and 298 nm, respectively. Direct simultaneous determination with normal fluorescence spectroscopy was difficult. The use of synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy for analyzing the studied drugs in ethanol at Δλ = 80 nm improved spectral resolution and enabled the determination of favipiravir and aspirin in the plasma matrix at 437 nm and 384 nm, respectively. The method described allowed sensitive determination of favipiravir and aspirin over a concentration range of 10-500 ng/mL and 35-1600 ng/mL, respectively. The described method was validated with respect to the ICH M10 guidelines and successfully applied for the simultaneous determination of the mentioned drugs in pure form and in the spiked plasma matrix. Moreover, the compliance of the method with the concepts of environmentally friendly analytical chemistry was evaluated using two metrics, the Green Analytical Procedure Index and the AGREE tool. The results showed that the described method was consistent with the accepted metrics for green analytical chemistry.

Aspirin use is associated with decreased inpatient mortality in patients with COVID-19: A meta-analysis.

Thromboembolism is a major cause of death in patients who suffer from COVID-19. Studies examining the effects of aspirin (ASA) on mortality relating to this phenomenon have showed conflicting results with varying degrees and certainties of evidence. We performed an aggregate data meta-analysis of fourteen studies encompassing 164,539 COVID-19 patients, which showed a reduced risk of in-hospital mortality associated with ASA use in eight studies that reported risk ratios (RR 0.90; 95 % CI 0.82-0.98; I2 = 27.33 %, P = 0.01), six studies that reported hazard ratios (HR 0.56; 95 % CI 0.41-0.76, P ≤ 0.01; I2 = 85.92 %) and pooled effect size (0.71; 95 % CI 0.59-0.85, P = 0.00, I2 = 91.51 %). The objective of this study is to report the association between low dose ASA and a reduced risk of in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19.

A Decade of Clinical Advances in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: 2012-2022.

The field of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is constantly evolving. In the past 10 years, key advancements in basic and translational research as well as clinical studies have improved our understanding and management of CRS. Notably, treatment options have expanded to include novel therapeutic drugs, devices, and surgical techniques. Assessments of patient symptoms and their impact on quality of life have become more standardized. Progress has also been made in both determining the true prevalence of CRS and recognizing comorbidities that can impact CRS severity. Practice guidelines have also shifted from expert opinion to more data-driven analyses. This review highlights major clinical advancements made in the field of CRS over the past 10 years as well as identifies current gaps in knowledge that can form the basis for new areas of study over the next decade.

Impact Analysis of Aspirin over the Cardiac Activity

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in most developed countries, including the United States, with a significant economic impact. Lifestyle changes and the administration of antiplatelet medication, like aspirin, may significantly contribute to the secondary prevention of CVD in adults. For years, aspirin has been utilized for both secondary and primary cardiovascular disease prevention. Aspirin has been extensively used because of the belief that it may have a positive impact on primary prevention, despite the debate surrounding its usage. This study briefly examines usage patterns and discusses the potential variables and factors that can decrease the ability of aspirin to prevent cardiovascular disease. The present study also explore the key studies of aspirin use in the context of recent recommendations. The risk of bleeding has been observed to significantly rise, although large randomized clinical studies have demonstrated a reduction or absence of CVD events. Prevention strategies for cardiovascular disease with low-dose aspirin are no longer advised for persons at intermediate risk. To determine whether taking aspirin is worth the potential dangers, the benefits must be evaluated.Copyright © 2022 Novyi Russkii Universitet. All rights reserved.

Early Multi-Target Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19, Particularly in Terms of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Indomethacin

Recently, in Italy, a flowchart to be used by General Practitioners for the at-home treatment of patients with COVID-19, has been released. It states that early at-home treatment for SARS-CoV-2 infection is possible due to the availability of specific antiviral drugs to be used in at-risk patients, and that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have an important function in combating the virus. Therefore, the use of NSAIDs is not only rational but also effective in cases that cannot be treated using antivirals. These seemingly simple concepts have been applied in Italy since the beginning of the pandemic by doctors that belong to Italian groups created in order to help COVID-19 patients early at home, at a time of organizational difficulties within Italian health institutions and government. However, this approach was largely boycotted by both the Italian Ministry of Health and medical institutions, which mainly suggested the use of paracetamol as symptomatic, and a wait-and-watch approach for the first three days from the onset of symptoms. In this article, we analyze the rationale for the use of NSAIDs and, in particular, the multi-targeted approach including indomethacin in synergism with flavonoids and low-dose aspirin, as early at-home treatment of patients with COVID-19. Applying these simple concepts from the beginning could have reduced the high lethality of the disease during the first two years of the pandemic and prevented hospital overload. In perspective, it is still necessary to systematically address the comparison between different therapeutic approaches to this viral disease on an experimental basis. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of BioMed is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

The use of aspirin in patients suffering from COVID-19 disease

Aspirin, in moderately higher doses, can be considered with close monitoring for COVID-19 as this is a relatively inexpensive and a promising therapeutic alternative to save lives.

COVID-19 and the Response to Antiplatelet Therapy.

The coronavirus SARS-CoV2 disease (COVID-19) is connected with significant morbidity and mortality (3.4%), disorders in hemostasis, including coagulopathy, activation of platelets, vascular injury, and changes in fibrinolysis, which may be responsible for an increased risk of thromboembolism. Many studies demonstrated relatively high rates of venous and arterial thrombosis related to COVID-19. The incidence of arterial thrombosis in severe/critically ill intensive care unit-admitted COVID-19 patients appears to be around 1%. There are several ways for the activation of platelets and coagulation that may lead to the formation of thrombi, so it is challenging to make a decision about optimal antithrombotic strategy in patients with COVID-19. This article reviews the current knowledge about the role of antiplatelet therapy in patients with COVID-19.

Distinct platelet crosstalk with adaptive and innate immune cells after adenoviral and mRNA vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.

BACKGROUND: Genetic-based COVID-19 vaccines have proved to be highly effective in reducing the risk of hospitalization and death. Because they were first distributed in a large-scale population, the adenoviral-based vaccines were linked to a very rare thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, and the interplay between platelets and vaccinations increasingly gained attention. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this article was to study the crosstalk between platelets and the vaccine-induced immune response. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled young healthy volunteers who received the mRNA-based vaccine, BNT162b2 (n = 15), or the adenovirus-based vaccine, AZD1222 (n = 25) and studied their short-term platelet and immune response before and after vaccine injections. In a separate cohort, we retrospectively analyzed the effect of aspirin on the antibody response 1 and 5 months after BNT162b2 vaccination. RESULTS: Here, we show that a faster antibody response to either vaccine is associated with the formation of platelet aggregates with marginal zone-like B cells, a subset geared to bridge the temporal gap between innate and adaptive immunities. However, although the mRNA-based vaccine is associated with a more gradual and tolerogenic response that fosters the crosstalk between platelets and adaptive immunity, the adenovirus-based vaccine, the less immunogenic of the 2, evokes an antiviral-like response during which the platelets are cleared and less likely to cooperate with B cells. Moreover, subjects taking aspirin (n = 56) display lower antibody levels after BNT162b2 vaccination compared with matched individuals. CONCLUSION: Platelets are a component of the innate immune pathways that promote the B-cell response after vaccination. Future studies on the platelet-immune crosstalk post-immunization will improve the safety, efficacy, and strategic administration of next-generation vaccines.

Antiplatelet therapy for patients with COVID-19: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials.

Background: Hyperinflammation and coagulopathy are hallmarks of COVID-19 and synergistically contribute to illness progression. Antiplatelet agents have been proposed as candidate drugs for COVID-19 treatment on the basis of their antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory properties. A systematic review and meta-analysis that included early observational studies and recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to summarize and compare evidence on this issue. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched to identify studies published up to Nov 7, 2021, and the results of registered clinical trials were followed up to Mar 30, 2022. We included RCTs and observational studies assessing the effect of antiplatelet therapy in adult patients with COVID-19. Data on baseline patient characteristics, interventions, controls, and outcomes were extracted by two independent reviewers. The primary outcome was mortality. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Results: Twenty-seven studies were included, of which 23 observational studies were pooled in a meta-analysis, and the remaining four RCTs (ACTIV-4B, RECOVERY, ACTIV-4a, and REMAP-CAP) were narratively synthesized. Based on 23 observational studies of 87,824 COVID-19 patients, antiplatelet treatment favors a lower risk of mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-0.85; I 2 = 87.0%, P < 0.01]. The narrative synthesis of RCTs showed conflicting evidence, which did not support adding antiplatelet therapy to the standard care, regardless of the baseline illness severity and concomitant anticoagulation intensity. Conclusion: While the rationale for using antiplatelet treatment in COVID-19 patients is compelling and was supported by the combined result of early observational studies, evidence from RCTs did not confirm this approach. Several factors that could explain this inconsistency were highlighted alongside perspectives on future research directions.

A case report of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) associated with COVID-19 in Maha Sarakham, Thailand

We report a case of a 19-year-old female with multisystemic inflammatory syndrome that was associated with the novel coronavirs disease 2019 (COVID-19), which manifested as serious illness that occurred four weeks after COVID-19 infection. Her clinical manifestations involved multiple organ systems including high-grade fever with shock syndrome, pulmonary edema, myopericarditis with pericardial effusion, hepatitis, generalized maculopapular rash, and several elevated inflammatory markers. She was treated with human immunoglobulin, methylprednisolone, acetylsalicylic acid, enoxaparin, and empirical antibiotics. She required a 2-week hospitalization and was discharged after improvement of clinical symptoms and normalization of inflammatory markers. A day prior to discharge, an echocardiography was done and it showed normal ventricular function and no coronary aneurysmal dilation.

Loss of smell in patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease impacts mental health and quality of life.

BACKGROUND: The impact of anosmia on quality-of-life (QoL) for patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is poorly understood. We aimed to investigate how the severity of smell loss and olfactory dysfunction (OD) in patients with AERD affects their QoL, mental health and physical well-being. METHODS: Five validated QoL questionnaires (Sinonasal Outcome Test-22, Asthma Control Test, Healthy Days Core Module-4, Short Form-36 and Patient Health Questionnaire-4) and two newly developed questionnaires assessing severity and consequences of OD were electronically sent to all 2913 patients in the Brigham and Women's Hospital AERD registry. Responses were received from 853 participants for analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 85% of participants reported a present diminished sense of smell and/or taste, and 30% categorized their OD severity was, "as bad as it can be." There were significant relationships between the severity of self-reported OD and both psychological distress and general health scores, even after adjusting for asthma control. Additionally, incidence rates for physically and mentally unhealthy days in the prior month were higher for patients with moderate or severe OD than for normosmic patients. Patients with diminished smell responded that they could not identify spoiled food (86%), did not enjoy food (71%), felt unsafe (63%) and had encountered dangerous situations (51%) as consequences of their OD. CONCLUSIONS: Anosmia and hyposmia severely impact the physical, emotional and mental health of AERD patients, and lead to safety concerns in their daily lives. The importance of olfaction and the relevance of OD to patients' QoL should be acknowledged and evaluated by clinicians caring for these patients.

All-cause and in-hospital mortality after aspirin use in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: With the results of the largest randomized controlled trial (RECOVERY) and the most extensive retrospective cohort study on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) recently published, we performed a meta-analysis on the association of aspirin with mortality of COVID-19. We aimed to investigate the role of aspirin in COVID-19 hospitalizations. Materials and Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases for studies from 1 January 2020 until 20 July 2022, that compared aspirin versus non-aspirin use in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. We excluded case reports, review articles and studies on non-hospitalized COVID-19 infections. We used the inverse variance method and random effects model to pool the individual studies. Results: Ten observational studies and one randomized controlled trial met the criteria for inclusion. There were 136 695 total patients, of which 27 168 were in the aspirin group and 109 527 were in the non-aspirin group. Aspirin use was associated with a 14% decrease in all-cause mortality compared with non-aspirin use in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 [relative risk (RR) 0.86, confidence interval (95% CI) 0.76-0.97; P = 0.002; I 2 =64%]. Among subgroups of studies reporting in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 hospitalizations, aspirin use was associated with a 16% decrease in in-hospital mortality compared with non-aspirin use (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71-0.99; P = 0.007; I 2 =64%). Conclusion: Our study shows that aspirin decreases in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Further studies are needed to assess which COVID-19 patient populations benefit most, such as patients on aspirin for primary versus secondary prevention of atherosclerotic disease. In addition, significant bleeding also needs to be considered when assessing the risk-benefit of aspirin use.

Controlled Release- Nanomedicine(CRNM) of aspirin using "Biomimetic Niosomal Nanoparticles (BNNs)”for Covid-19 and cardiovascular treatment: DOE based optimization

Biomimetic strategies can be adopted to improve biopharmaceutical aspects. Subsequently, Biomimetic reconstitutable pegylated amphiphilic lipid nanocarriers have high translation potential for systemic controlled drug delivery;however, such an improvised system for systemic aspirin delivery exploring nanotechnology is not available. Systemic administration of aspirin and its controlled delivery can significantly control blood clotting events, leading to stroke, which has applications in cardiovascular diseases and Covid-19. In this work, we are developing aspirin sustained release pegylated amphiphilic self-assembling nanoparticles to develop reconstitutable aspirin injections by solvent-based co-precipitation method with phase inversion technique that leads to novel "biomimetic niosomal nanoparticles (BNNs).” DOE led optimization is done to develop Design of space for optimized particles. Upon reconstitution of solid powder, the particle size was 144.8 ± 12.90 nm with a surface charge of -29.2 ± 2.24mV. The entrapment efficiency was found to be 49 ± 0.15%, wherein 96.99 ± 1.57 % of the drug was released in 24hr showing super case II transport-based drug release mechanism. The formulation has the least hemolysis while showing significant suppression of platelet aggregation. MTT assay does not show any significant cytotoxicity. This is a potential nanoparticle that can be explored for developing aspirin injection, which is not available.

Analysis of Prior Aspirin Treatment on in-Hospital Outcome of Geriatric COVID-19 Infected Patients.

Background and Objectives: Aspirin (ASA) is a commonly used antithrombotic drug that has been demonstrated to reduce venous thromboembolism. The aim was to analyze if geriatric COVID-19 patients undergoing a 100 mg/day Aspirin (ASA) treatment prior to hospitalization differ in hospital outcome compared to patients without previous ASA therapy. Materials and Methods: An observational retrospective study was carried out using an anonymized database including geriatric COVID-19 patients (March to April 2020) admitted to Madrid Hospitals Group. A group of COVID-19 patients were treated with low ASA (100 mg/day) prior to COVID-19 infection. Results: Geriatric ASA-treated patients were older (mean age over 70 years; n = 41), had higher frequency of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, and upon admission had higher D-dimer levels than non-ASA-treated patients (mean age over 73 years; n = 160). However, patients under ASA treatment did not show more frequent pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) than non-ASA-treated patients. ASA-treated geriatric COVID-19-infected patients in-hospital < 30 days all-cause mortality was more frequent than in non-ASA-treated COVID-19 patients. In ASA-treated COVID-19-infected geriatric patients, anticoagulant therapy with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) significantly reduced need of ICU care, but tended to increase in-hospital < 30 days all-cause mortality. Conclusions: Prior treatment with a low dose of ASA in COVID-19-infected geriatric patients increased frequency of in-hospital < 30 days all-cause mortality, although it seemed to not increase PE frequency despite D-dimer levels upon admission being higher than in non-ASA users. In ASA-treated geriatric COVID-19-infected patients, addition of LMWH therapy reduced frequency of ICU care, but tended to increase in-hospital < 30 days all-cause mortality.

Effect of Aspirin Use on clinical Outcome among Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19

Background Critically ill COVID-19 patients are at risk of developing major complications with high mortality rate. Aspirin might have favorable effects in severe COVID-19 via various mechanisms besides inhibition of platelet aggregation. The role of aspirin as adjuvant therapy in critically ill patients with COVID-19 has not been studied. In this study, we investigated the correlation between aspirin use and the clinical outcome in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Methods This is a retrospective cohort observational study of critically ill COVID-19 Egyptian patients. Participants were divided into two groups: patients who received aspirin, 150 mg per day orally, upon admission to the intensive care unit, and those who did not. The primary outcome in this study was the shift to invasive ventilatory support. Results A total of 1190 patients were involved in the study, 660 patients received aspirin, while 530 patients did not. Among aspirin group compared to non-aspirin group, invasive ventilatory support, DVT, PE, stroke, ACS, ARDS, AKI, septic shock, and mortality were less frequent, and the differences were significant except for ACS, AKI, and septic shock. Major bleeding was non-significantly more frequent. The length of ICU stay was significantly longer among non-survivors, and shorter among survivors. The variations between the two groups were significant among subgroups >= 40 or 60. Conclusions In critically ill patients with COVID-19, aspirin has the potential role as an adjuvant therapeutic, lowering the risk of mechanical ventilation, thromboembolic events, ARDS, and ICU mortality. Patients older than 40 years were a significant category that might benefit from aspirin.